E. Cardis et al., DIRECT ESTIMATES OF CANCER MORTALITY DUE TO LOW-DOSES OF IONIZING-RADIATION - AN INTERNATIONAL STUDY, Lancet, 344(8929), 1994, pp. 1039-1043
When setting standards for protection against ionising radiation it ha
s been usual to extrapolate from experience with high-dose short-term
exposure-studies based on atom bomb survivors and patients exposed to
radiation therapeutically. Those who work in the nuclear industry are
exposed to low-level predominantly gamma radiation for longer periods,
and provide an alternative direct source of information. We have comb
ined mortality data from seven cohort studies on nearly 96 000 nuclear
industry workers monitored for external radiation in Canada, UK, and
USA to assess directly the carcinogenic effects of protracted low-dose
exposure to ionising radiation. The excess relative risk for death fr
om leukaemia, excluding chronic lymphocytic leukaemia, was 2.2 per Sv
(90% Cl 0.1 to 5.7). This estimate is intermediate between the linear
estimate of 3.7 per Sv and the linear-quadratic estimate (as used in r
ecent leukaemia risk assessments) of 1.4 per Sv derived from Japanese
atomic bomb survivors' data. The excess relative risk for death from a
ll cancers, excluding leukaemia, was -0.07 per Sv (90% Cl -0.4 to 0.3)
. This estimate is consistent with a range of risks varying from negat
ive to nearly twice those estimated from atomic bomb survivors (0.18 p
er Sv). These are the most precise direct estimates so far made of car
cinogenic risk after protracted exposure to low-dose ionising radiatio
n. They provide little evidence that the estimates that form the basis
of current radiation protection recommendations are appreciably in er
ror.