THE LEARNING OF NOVEL FINGER MOVEMENT SEQUENCES

Citation
Am. Gordon et al., THE LEARNING OF NOVEL FINGER MOVEMENT SEQUENCES, Journal of neurophysiology, 72(4), 1994, pp. 1596-1610
Citations number
55
Categorie Soggetti
Neurosciences,Physiology
Journal title
ISSN journal
00223077
Volume
72
Issue
4
Year of publication
1994
Pages
1596 - 1610
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-3077(1994)72:4<1596:TLONFM>2.0.ZU;2-J
Abstract
1. Experienced typists typed phrases containing words in which one iso lated letter was typed with one hand, while the remaining letters were typed with the contralateral hand. 2. The translational and rotationa l motion of the fingers and wrist of the right hand were obtained opto electronically from the location of reflective markers placed on the f ingers. 3. Midway through the experiment, the key corresponding to the isolated letter was physically switched with another key on the keybo ard, and subjects typed the letter in its new location (for 140 trials ). The letter ''n,'' typed with the right index finger, was either swi tched with letters normally typed with the same finger (u), with a dif ferent finger but same hand (o), with the same finger of the left hand (v), or with a different finger of the left hand (w). 4. When the wor ds were typed normally, the interkey intervals were relatively short, and the onset of movement of the right hand began before the preceding keypress with the left hand. Thus the movement of the two hands overl apped. Furthermore, the movement to the isolated key was highly stereo typical, with little trial-to-trial variability. 5. After the transpos ition of keys, there were prolongations in the interkey intervals, wit h the largest delay occurring directly before the typing of the transp osed key. Switches between homologous fingers (involving mirror moveme nts) delayed the onset of keypresses to a lesser extent than did other switches. With practice, these delays were reduced but never reached the control level. 6. After the keyswitch, the onset of movement to th e isolated key did not occur on average until after the last keypress with the contralateral hand, except when the switch involved the use o f homologous fingers. In the latter case, overlapping movement of the two hands was maintained. Thus the learning of a series of discrete mo vements does not necessarily require that each movement segment be per formed sequentially. 7. After the transposition of keys, the movement pattern and time course to a given key were similar to the movement pa tterns for that key observed during control trials in all conditions. Thus the learning of a series of movements may involve the use of prev iously learned movements under new conditions. 8. The results suggest that typing movements may be organized at several levels, including th e individual keystroke and word level.