Consider a pharmaceutical trial where the consequences of different de
cisions are expressed on a financial scale. The efficacy of the new dr
ug under consideration has a prior distribution obtained from the unde
rlying biological process, animal experiments, clinical experience, an
d so forth. Berry and Ho (Biometrics 44, 219-227) show how these compo
nents are used to establish an optimal (Bayes) sequential testing proc
edure, assuming a known constant sample size at each decision point. W
e show in this article how it is also possible to optimize further, wi
th respect to the sample-size rule. This last component of the design,
which is missing from most sequential procedures, has the potential t
o yield considerably larger expected net gains (equivalently, consider
ably smaller Bayes risks).