Dm. Tucker et al., CANAL WALL PLANNING BY ENGINE-DRIVEN NICKEL-TITANIUM INSTRUMENTS, COMPARED WITH STAINLESS-STEEL HAND INSTRUMENTATION, Journal of endodontics, 23(3), 1997, pp. 170-173
Twenty-two mesial roots of extracted human mandibular molars were divi
ded into two groups based on root curvature and length, The mesiolingu
al canals were instrumented using either Flexofiles in a step-back ant
icurvature filing method, or they were instrumented with engine-driven
0.02 taper nickel-titanium files, Ground sections were prepared at 1-
, 2.5-, and 5-mm levels from the working length, The mesiobuccal canal
was used as an uninstrumented control for predentin character, Digiti
zing software was used to calculate the instrumented portion as a perc
entage of the total canal perimeter. The results indicated no signific
ant difference in overall canal wall planing between the two groups an
d no significant difference at each of the three levels.