Fmf. Degroot et al., DIFFERENCES BETWEEN L(3) AND L(2) X-RAY-ABSORPTION SPECTRA OF TRANSITION-METAL COMPOUNDS, The Journal of chemical physics, 101(8), 1994, pp. 6570-6576
The differences between L(3) and L(2) edges of 3d and 4d transition me
tal complexes and compounds in octahedral symmetry are discussed. The
main origin of these differences are the multiplet effects due to the
coupling of the 2p core wave function and the 3d and 4d valence wave f
unctions. The 3d and 4d spin-orbit coupling is a second origin of diff
erence. For 3d systems the multiplet effects dominate all other intera
ctions and the L(3) and L(2) edge are completely mixed and reordered.
For 4d systems the core hole spin-orbit coupling is large and the L(3)
and L(2) are separated by about 100 eV with a ratio close to 2:1. The
differences between the L(3) and L(2) edge originate from the weight
transfer between the t(2g) and e(g) peaks due to the multiplet effect.
This weight transfer is about 25% for the L(3) edge and about 5% for
the L(2) edge, which implies that for a comparison to single-particle
calculations the L(2) edge is preferable to use. Partly filled 4d syst
ems are low-spin and the occupation of the t(2g) states implies a decr
ease of the first peak. This decrease is stronger for the L(2) edge, i
mplying an increase in the L(3):L(2) ratio. For 4d(5) systems transiti
ons to the t(2g) hole are only possible at the L(3) edge due to the co
mbined effects of 4d spin-orbit coupling and the dd multiplet effects.