Re. Rowe et al., RETROGRADE VERSUS ANTEGRADE CANNULATION IN THE INTRAVENOUS GLUCOSE-TOLERANCE TEST, Diabetes research and clinical practice, 25(2), 1994, pp. 131-136
To investigate whether drawing blood from a retrogradely cannulated ha
nd vein rather than an antegradely cannulated arm vein improves reprod
ucibility in the intravenous tolerance test (IVGTT) we compared these
two methods directly by drawing blood from the two sites on the same a
rm simultaneously. We found no difference in intrasubject coefficients
of variation for the measurement of insulin response to glucose (21.5
% vs. 22.5%) or insulin sensitivity (22.8 vs. 24.7%) for these two met
hods. However, the values for insulin response to glucose were signifi
cantly increased when blood was drawn from the hand site (410.1 vs. 32
8.7 pM, P < 0.05). In addition, the failure rate for studies using the
retrogradely cannulated hand vein was significantly increased (5% of
arm veins vs. 20% of hand veins cannulated, P < 0.05) particularly in
female subjects. In conclusion, drawing blood samples from a retrograd
ely cannulated hand vein appears to have no effect on the reproducibil
ity of the intravenous glucose tolerance test. The acute insulin respo
nse to glucose obtained from samples drawn in this manner is, however,
significantly increased and this should be borne in mind when compari
ng results from centers using these different methods.