G. Thut et al., WHAT IS THE ROLE OF THE CORPUS-CALLOSUM IN INTERMANUAL TRANSFER OF MOTOR-SKILLS - A STUDY OF 3 CASES WITH CALLOSAL PATHOLOGY, Experimental Brain Research, 113(2), 1997, pp. 365-370
Intermanual transfer for a skilled motor task was studied in two patie
nts with total callosal agenesis, and one with an acquired partial cal
losal lesion and clinical evidence for disturbed transfer of motor sig
nals. Patients had to draw meaningless figures with one upper extremit
y (original learning, OL) and to reproduce their mirror-reversals ther
eafter with the other side (transfer learning, TL). Both directions of
intermanual transfer were tested in two conditions, that is, between
either proximal or distal muscle groups. Transfer was evaluated by com
paring OL and TL performance at the same effector. The main variable o
f interest was movement time during the first eight trials of OL and T
L. All three patients displayed a significant benefit for transfer fro
m the dominant to the non-dominant hand but not vice versa during prox
imal motor activity. When compared with the performance of healthy sub
jects tested in almost identical conditions in a;previously reported s
tudy, the proximal transfer behavior was found to be similar for all p
atients and the normal group. Although patients exhibited no significa
nt benefit for distal transfer, their non-dominant-to-dominant distal
transfer was above the normal range. The similar transfer pattern of t
he patients and healthy subjects when using proximal musculature sugge
sts that proximal transfer may be subserved by identical extracallosal
pathways, most probably by the ipsilaterally descending motor systems
. Since non-dominant-to-dominant distal transfer was found to be disad
vantageous in healthy subjects, the patients' relative superiority in
this condition may reflect missing callosal influences of an inhibitor
y nature.