WHY NO ADDITIVE HAZARDS MODELS

Authors
Citation
M. Newby, WHY NO ADDITIVE HAZARDS MODELS, IEEE transactions on reliability, 43(3), 1994, pp. 484-488
Citations number
19
Categorie Soggetti
Computer Sciences","Engineering, Eletrical & Electronic","Computer Science Hardware & Architecture","Computer Science Software Graphycs Programming
ISSN journal
00189529
Volume
43
Issue
3
Year of publication
1994
Pages
484 - 488
Database
ISI
SICI code
0018-9529(1994)43:3<484:WNAHM>2.0.ZU;2-1
Abstract
The intuitively attractive additive hazards model is compared with pro portional hazards and accelerated failure time models. The lack of ide ntifiability limits the use of the model and prevents the application of regression versions using covariates. Fortunately, data analysis ba sed on nonhomogeneous Poisson processes or on proportional hazards is likely to yield most of the information available in the data, even th ough they: 1) do not necessarily represent the underlying process, and 2) even seem unlikely in certain situations. In particular, proportio nal hazards modeling appears very robust and requires few assumptions.