RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY FOR IMPALPABLE PROSTATE-CANCER - THE JOHNS-HOPKINS EXPERIENCE WITH TUMORS FOUND ON TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION (STAGES T1A AND T1B) AND ON NEEDLE-BIOPSY (STAGE T1C)
Ji. Epstein et al., RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY FOR IMPALPABLE PROSTATE-CANCER - THE JOHNS-HOPKINS EXPERIENCE WITH TUMORS FOUND ON TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION (STAGES T1A AND T1B) AND ON NEEDLE-BIOPSY (STAGE T1C), The Journal of urology, 152(5), 1994, pp. 1721-1729
We review the pathological findings of impalpable prostate cancer dete
cted by transurethral resection (stages T1a and T1b) and needle biopsy
(stage T1c). The short-term (4 years) and long-term (8 to 10 years) n
atural histories of untreated stage Tla prostate cancer are examined,
as are options to follow patients expectantly. The findings on radical
prostatectomy for stages T1a and T1b disease are reviewed and compare
d. Of the 64 cases of stage T1a disease 13 (20%) showed substantial tu
mor, including 7 with more than 1 cc of tumor, 5 with capsular penetra
tion and 1 with a Gleason grade 4 + 5 = 9 tumor. Based on preoperative
pathological parameters, one could not predict which cases had minima
l versus substantial tumor. In a study from our institution that under
took complete histological examination of 39 radical prostatectomy spe
cimens of stage T1b carcinoma, we found that all prostates contained r
esidual carcinoma, 26% had capsular penetration and 10% had invasion o
f the seminal vesicles. When comparing morphometrically determined vol
umes of carcinoma with similar data from 56 patients with stage T2 car
cinoma, stage T1b tumors were much more heterogeneous in grade, locati
on and volume than were stage T2 lesions. Unless all 3 variables (grad
e, volume and location) were known, the final pathological stage of T1
b cancers could not be predicted with confidence. Finally, we examined
preoperative clinical and pathological parameters in 157 men with cli
nical stage T1c disease undergoing radical prostatectomy, and correlat
ed these findings with pathological extent of disease in the surgical
specimen in an attempt to identify a subset of patients with potential
ly biologically insignificant tumor who might be followed conservative
ly. Of the tumors 16% were insignificant (less than 0.2 cc, organ conf
ined and Gleason grade less than 7), 10% were minimal (0.2 to 0.5 cc,
organ confined and Gleason grade less than 7), 37% were moderate (more
than 0.5 cc or capsular penetration with Gleason sum less than 7) and
37% were advanced (capsular penetration with Gleason sum 7 or more, o
r positive margins, positive seminal vesicles or positive lymph nodes)
. These findings are intermediate between those found in clinical stag
es T1a and T2 disease. The best model predicting insignificant tumor w
as a prostate specific antigen (PSA) density of less than 0.1 and no a
dverse pathological finding on needle biopsy or a PSA density of 0.1 t
o 0.15 with less than 3 mm. low to intermediate grade cancer on only 1
needle biopsy core. The positive predictive value of the model was 95
% with a negative predictive value of 66%. Using this model, we accura
tely predicted 73% of cases with insignificant tumor. Although most im
palpable prostate cancers diagnosed by needle biopsy are significant t
umors that warrant definitive therapy, it may be reasonable to follow
some patients whose tumors are most likely insignificant with serial P
SA measurements and repeat biopsies.