THE PROSTATE-CANCER INTERVENTION VERSUS OBSERVATION TRIAL - A RANDOMIZED TRIAL COMPARING RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY VERSUS EXPECTANT MANAGEMENT FOR THE TREATMENT OF CLINICALLY LOCALIZED PROSTATE-CANCER
Tj. Wilt et Mk. Brawer, THE PROSTATE-CANCER INTERVENTION VERSUS OBSERVATION TRIAL - A RANDOMIZED TRIAL COMPARING RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY VERSUS EXPECTANT MANAGEMENT FOR THE TREATMENT OF CLINICALLY LOCALIZED PROSTATE-CANCER, The Journal of urology, 152(5), 1994, pp. 1910-1914
The Prostate Cancer Intervention Versus Observation Trial (PIVOT) is a
randomized controlled trial sponsored by the Department of Veterans A
ffairs and the National Cancer Institute. PIVOT will enroll 2,000 part
icipants from at least 80 Veterans Administration and National Cancer
Institute medical centers. The purpose of PIVOT is to determine which
of 2 strategies is superior for managing clinically localized prostate
cancer (stage T1/T2NXM0) of all histological grades. Patients less th
an 75 years old will be randomized to either radical prostatectomy wit
h early intervention for disease persistence/recurrence or expectant m
anagement with palliative therapy reserved for symptomatic or metastat
ic disease progression. Participants will be excluded if they have rec
eived prior therapy for prostate cancer (except transurethral resectio
n of the prostate) or are judged not to be candidates for radical pros
tatectomy. All patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer will be r
ecorded on the PIVOT screening log. Registry information will include
patient age, race, prostate specific antigen level, clinical stage, hi
stological tumor grade, initial therapy, and vital status. Patients me
eting eligibility criteria will watch an information and randomization
video tape developed for PIVOT. Participants will be randomized over
a 3-year period and followed for a minimum of 12 years. Data collected
at followup will include urological symptoms, disease and treatment r
elated morbidity, and disease specific and overall quality of life. Ev
idence of symptomatic or asymptomatic disease persistence, recurrence
or progression will be measured by questionnaire, physical examination
, digital rectal examination, prostate specific antigen and annual bon
e scan. The primary study end point will be all cause mortality. Secon
dary outcomes will include prostate cancer and treatment specific morb
idity and mortality rates, health status, predictors of disease specif
ic outcomes and cost-effectiveness. PIVOT will provide a 90% power to
detect a 15% relative decrease in all cause mortality and a 35% relati
ve decrease in prostate cancer specific mortality rate by either treat
ment strategy.