Bh. Davis et al., FLOW CYTOMETRIC RETICULOCYTE ANALYSIS - MULTIINSTITUTIONAL INTERLABORATORY CORRELATION STUDY, American journal of clinical pathology, 102(4), 1994, pp. 468-477
Reticulocyte analysis by flow cytometry offers precision and sensitivi
ty greater than those of conventional morphologic methods and permits
derivation of a reticulocyte maturity index. However, interlaboratory
variability has not yet been reported. The authors analyzed 310 sample
s at eight sites using 11 instruments over a 4-month period to examine
intermethod and interlaboratory variabilities. Stains included thiazo
le orange, ethidium bromide, and auramine O. Instruments included mode
ls by Coulter, Becton Dickinson, TOA Medical Electronics, and Ortho Di
agnostics. The coefficient of variation (CV) among all sites and metho
ds on these samples varied as a function of the reticulocyte percentag
e, ranging from a mean CV of 69% for samples with <.5% reticulocytes t
o 24.1% for those with >2.5% reticulocytes. The best performance was o
bserved with the TOA R-1000 dedicated reticulocyte analyzers, with a m
ean CV of 18.4% for samples with <.5% reticulocytes and 4.6% for sampl
es with >2.5% reticulocytes. The reticulocyte maturity index showed co
mparable intersite precision, with a mean CV of 16% for samples with >
2.5% reticulocytes with multipurpose flow cytometers and a mean CV of
7.3% with the TOA R-1000 instruments. Interclass correlations among al
l sites ranged from .79 to .99 for the reticulocyte counts and .41 to
.88 for the reticulocyte maturity index. The authors conclude that flo
w cytometric reticulocyte analysis is more precise than manual reticul
ocyte analysis. With greater automation of this methodology, further i
nterlaboratory standardization of reticulocyte counts and the reticulo
cyte maturity index can be achieved.