Av. Hodges et al., ELECTRIC AUDITORY BRAIN-STEM RESPONSES IN NUCLEUS MULTICHANNEL COCHLEAR IMPLANT USERS, Archives of otolaryngology, head & neck surgery, 120(10), 1994, pp. 1093-1099
Objective: The electrically elicited auditory brainstem response (EABR
) has been proposed as a tool for use in cochlear implant device setti
ng. To systematically examine the relationships of psychophysical perc
eptions and EABRs, implant users underwent a series of comparative mea
surements. The characteristics of the EABR were assessed for their pre
dictive value in determining the subjective measures needed to set the
implant device. Design: Characteristics of the EABR and various perce
ptual measures in a group of cochlear implant users served as compared
variables in a correlational study. S Setting: The study was carried
out in the audiology clinic of a university hospital. The audiology cl
inic maintained a fully equipped evoked potential laboratory, and was
part of an otolaryngology department that supported a cochlear implant
program. Subjects: The subjects consisted of 10 consecutively selecte
d postlinguistically deafened adult multichannel cochlear implant user
s. Main Outcome Measures: Morphology, latency, and amplitude measures
of the EABR recordings were compared with behavioral perceptions of th
reshold, most comfortable and uncomfortable loudness levels. Results:
Perceptual measures of threshold were found to be significantly relate
d to the threshold of the EABR across subjects and electrode position.
Simple linear regression analysis was used to measure the degree of t
he relationship. An r value of 0.89 attests to a significant relations
hip; The EABR wave latencies and amplitudes were found to have no sign
ificant relationship to any of the perceptual measures examined. Concl
usions: Although EABR cannot replace behavioral measurements for devic
e setting, in difficult cases EABR thresholds may be used as a startin
g point from which to estimate settings for the device.