Hga. Bouwer et Dj. Hinrichs, ADOPTIVE TRANSFER OF EXPERIMENTAL ALLERGIC ENCEPHALOMYELITIS - RECIPIENT RESPONSE TO MYELIN BASIC PROTEIN-REACTIVE LYMPHOCYTES, Journal of neuroimmunology, 54(1-2), 1994, pp. 87-98
We have used adoptive transfer of myelin basic protein (MBP)-reactive
lymphocytes in the Lewis rat model of experimental allergic encephalom
yelitis (EAE) to identify stages of effector cell development and to i
nvestigate the nature of the subsequent recipient response to the tran
sferred cells. Depending on the timing of cell collection, lymph node
cells (LNC) obtained from MBP-CFA (MBP emulsified in complete Freund's
adjuvant)-immunized donors may directly transfer clinical disease; ho
wever, independent of disease development, recipients of LNC develop e
arly onset of clinical disease following immunization of the recipient
s with MBP-CFA, consistent with the presence of MBP-memory cells in th
e LNC transfer inoculum. Similarly obtained spleen cells do not direct
ly transfer disease and do not contain MBP-memory cells (as defined by
the early onset of clinical disease following MBP-CFA challenge). Spl
een cells adoptively transfer clinical disease only following in vitro
culture stimulation with antigen or selected mitogens. Recipients of
the primary culture-derived encephalitogenic spleen cells also develop
an accelerated onset of clinical disease following MBP-CFA challenge,
indicative of the presence of MBP-memory cells, and are not vaccinate
d. Encephalitogenic T cell lines adoptively transfer clinical disease,
and in most cases recipients are vaccinated to MBP-CFA-induced active
disease, but remain susceptible to adoptively transferred disease. Co
-transfer of encephalitogenic T cell line cells with MBP-reactive lymp
h node or encephalitogenic spleen cells does not alter the vaccination
response. We have found that during the process of T cell line develo
pment, the vaccinating phenotype is acquired following the second anti
gen stimulation cycle. These studies also demonstrate that regulation
induced by T cell vaccination blocks the development of effector cells
from precursor cells and that such regulation is also equally effecti
ve in blocking disease development in recipients which have increased
numbers of memory cells. Thus, the response to T cell vaccination, onc
e established, is fully capable of inhibiting the development of effec
tor cells from increased numbers of precursor/memory cells, a response
that would be needed in the clinical application of vaccination-induc
ed resistance.