COMPARISON OF 3 TEST METHODS USED FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF CANDIDIASIS

Citation
A. Skoglund et al., COMPARISON OF 3 TEST METHODS USED FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF CANDIDIASIS, Scandinavian Journal of Dental Research, 102(5), 1994, pp. 295-298
Citations number
27
Categorie Soggetti
Dentistry,Oral Surgery & Medicine
ISSN journal
0029845X
Volume
102
Issue
5
Year of publication
1994
Pages
295 - 298
Database
ISI
SICI code
0029-845X(1994)102:5<295:CO3TMU>2.0.ZU;2-1
Abstract
A total of 266 specimens was taken from oral mucosa or dentures of 88 patients with suspected Candida-infected oral mucosa. One-third of the debris from each sample was cultured on Microstix-Candida (C), strips , one-third was cultured on Oricult-N-plates, and the rest was collect ed on glass plates and stained by the periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) metho d. The PAS-stained samples were analyzed under the light microscope fo r the presence of Candida hyphae. The other samples (Oricult-N or Micr ostix-C) were studied visually, according to the manufacturer's recomm endation. PAS-stained specimens showed significantly less often positi ve results than those of the two culture methods. These data suggest t hat oral candidiasis may be incorrectly diagnosed if based upon result s obtained with the culture methods. It is also possible that the PAS- staining method yielded false negative findings. This possibility shou ld always be considered, especially if other findings and symptoms dis agree with the test results obtained.