Wh. Bickell et al., IMMEDIATE VERSUS DELAYED FLUID RESUSCITATION FOR HYPOTENSIVE PATIENTSWITH PENETRATING TORSO INJURIES, The New England journal of medicine, 331(17), 1994, pp. 1105-1109
Background. Fluid resuscitation may be detrimental when given before b
leeding is controlled in patients with trauma. The purpose of this stu
dy was to determine the effects of delaying fluid resuscitation until
the time of operative intervention in hypotensive patients with penetr
ating injuries to the torso. Methods. We conducted a prospective trial
comparing immediate and delayed fluid resuscitation in 598 adults wit
h penetrating torso injuries who presented with a pre; hospital systol
ic blood pressure less than or equal to 90 mm Hg. The study setting wa
s a city with a single centralized system of prehospital emergency car
e and a single receiving facility for patients with major trauma. Pati
ents assigned to the immediate-resuscitation group received standard f
luid resuscitation before they reached the hospital and in the trauma
center, and those assigned to the delayed-resuscitation group received
intravenous cannulation but no fluid resuscitation until they reached
the operating room. Results. Among the 289 patients who received dela
yed fluid resuscitation, 203 (70 percent) survived and were discharged
from the hospital, as compared with 193 of the 309 patients (62 perce
nt) who received immediate fluid resuscitation (P = 0.04). The mean es
timated intraoperative blood loss was similar in the two groups. Among
the 238 patients in the delayed-resuscitation group who survived to t
he postoperative period, 55 (23 percent) had. one or more complication
s (adult respiratory distress syndrome, sepsis syndrome, acute renal f
ailure, coagulopathy, wound infection, and pneumonia), as compared wit
h 69 of the 227 patients (30 percent) in the immediate-resuscitation g
roup (P = 0.08). The duration of hospitalization was shorter in the de
layed-resuscitation group. Conclusions. For hypotensive patients with
penetrating torso injuries, delay of aggressive fluid resuscitation un
til operative intervention improves the outcome.