THE DIVISION-OF-LABOR, CAPITALISM AND SOCIALISM - AN ALTERNATIVE TO SAYER

Citation
J. Gough et A. Eisenschitz, THE DIVISION-OF-LABOR, CAPITALISM AND SOCIALISM - AN ALTERNATIVE TO SAYER, International journal of urban and regional research, 21(1), 1997, pp. 23
Citations number
40
Categorie Soggetti
Planning & Development","Urban Studies
ISSN journal
03091317
Volume
21
Issue
1
Year of publication
1997
Database
ISI
SICI code
0309-1317(1997)21:1<23:TDCAS->2.0.ZU;2-6
Abstract
Sayer (1995) has argued that the division of labour has a structure th at is distinct from capitalist relations of production, and, following Hayek, that it is determined most strongly by the use of knowledge by enterprises. Conscious coordination or alteration of the division of labour therefore usually result in reduced efficiency and in an author itarian suppression of difference. In this article Eve argue that the division of labour in capitalism is strongly determined by conflict wi thin and between classes, and that in the short term socialist policy can and should aim to alter it. A model of socialist economic coordina tion is presented which is feasible and ameliorates many of the proble ms of the capitalist division of labour. This model would enable the d evelopment rather than suppression of positive differences.