Subject objective: To assess the hemodynamic effects of manual lung hy
perinflation in mechanically ventilated patients and to measure the di
fferent inspiratory pressures and tidal volumes generated by different
operators. Design: Measurements of aortic blood now (by esophageal Do
ppler ultrasonography), systemic blood pressure, tidal volumes (by res
pirometry), and inspiratory pressures in the ventilator circuit were m
easured on the ventilator, during six intended manual hyperinflations
(tidal volume > 150% that delivered by ventilator) using a 2-L rebreat
hing bag, and at 1, 5, 10, and 15 min after reconnection to the ventil
ator. Setting: Intensive care unit. Patients: Eighteen mechanically ve
ntilated patients with normovolemia and stable circulatory status were
assessed on a total of 20 occasions. Interventions: Patients were dis
connected from the ventilator to enable six manual hyperinflations to
be given. Measurements were made before and at 5-min intervals until n
o further hemodynamic changes were seen. Measurements and results: Hyp
erinflation (50% increase in tidal volume) was achieved only in 10 of
20 studies. Large variations were seen in percentage change in peak in
spiratory pressure (-30% to +250%) and tidal volume (-33% to +127%) ge
nerated. Falls in cardiac output correlated to the increase in tidal v
olume but not to the increase in peak inspiratory pressure and took up
to 15 min to recover to baseline values, Changes in cardiac output we
re independent of lung compliance and concurrent vasoactive drug suppo
rt. No consistent change was noted in either blood pressure or heart r
ate. Conclusions: Lung hyperinflation is frequently not achieved by th
e manual technique. Significant changes in cardiac output can occur an
d appear to be related to the tidal volume rather than pressure genera
ted.