ON ESTIMATING MAP MODEL ERRORS AND GPS POSITION ERRORS - (APPLYING MORE SCIENCE TO THE ART OF NAVIGATION)

Citation
P. Kielland et T. Tubman, ON ESTIMATING MAP MODEL ERRORS AND GPS POSITION ERRORS - (APPLYING MORE SCIENCE TO THE ART OF NAVIGATION), The International hydrographic review, 71(2), 1994, pp. 47-67
Citations number
NO
Categorie Soggetti
Oceanografhy,"Engineering, Marine","Water Resources
ISSN journal
00206946
Volume
71
Issue
2
Year of publication
1994
Pages
47 - 67
Database
ISI
SICI code
0020-6946(1994)71:2<47:OEMMEA>2.0.ZU;2-M
Abstract
In order to decide whether a desired manoeuver can or cannot be safely undertaken, a prudent navigator must be aware of both the current spa tial uncertainty of his vehicle's positioning system and the spatial u ncertainty of the navigational map model being used to depict the thea tre of operations. From this safety to navigation perspective, knowled ge of data accuracy is as important as the data itself. This paper dis cusses the Electronic Chart (EC) implications of both GPS vehicle posi tioning errors and the relatively large data modeling errors specific to bathymetric map models (charts). It proposes and demonstrates softw are solutions which statistically evaluate both of these spatial uncer tainties and graphically integrates the two stochastic models within a n EC environment. The paper also documents to an experiment carried ou t by the Canadian Hydrographic Service, designed to insure that real-t ime DGPS users compute statistically valid position error estimates. T he experiment ground truthed the position error estimates obtained usi ng a conventional real-time error analysis of pseudo-range redundancy. Using this ground-truth information, an improved pseudo-range error m odel was empirically determined. The new pseudorange error model is co ntinually updated using the estimated pseudo-range variances computed by the Novatel GPS receiver rather than applying the constant a priori pseudo-range variance typical in least-squares adjustments. This dyna mic range error model effectively reduced the statistical bias between the observed errors and their predicted error estimates. The improved range error model also significantly improved the performance of the position solution. All DGPS positions computed by the modified softwar e had a positional accuracy of better than 0.5 metres.