POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION-ASSISTED PAPILLOMAVIRUS DETECTION IN CERVICOVAGINAL SMEARS - STRATIFICATION BY CLINICAL RISK AND CYTOLOGY REPORTS

Citation
C. Kuhlerobbarius et al., POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION-ASSISTED PAPILLOMAVIRUS DETECTION IN CERVICOVAGINAL SMEARS - STRATIFICATION BY CLINICAL RISK AND CYTOLOGY REPORTS, Virchows Archiv, 425(2), 1994, pp. 157-163
Citations number
55
Categorie Soggetti
Pathology
Journal title
ISSN journal
09456317
Volume
425
Issue
2
Year of publication
1994
Pages
157 - 163
Database
ISI
SICI code
0945-6317(1994)425:2<157:PCRPDI>2.0.ZU;2-O
Abstract
Seven hundred and twelve patients from cancer screening, pregnancy car e, outpatient clinics for patients at risk for cervical dysplasia and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection were tested simultaneousl y for cytological aberrations and human papillomavirus (HPV). Classifi cation of these cases, and of all cytology records throughout 1991 and 1992 was performed according to the ''Munchner Nomenklatur'' and the Bethesda classification. HPV-directed polymerase chain reaction analys is was carried out with general primers, patients at risk for cervical dysplasia were tested by subsequent hybridization with HPV 16 and 18 probes. Patients from cancer screening and pregnancy care showed simil ar HPV prevalences ranging between 19.4%-24.6%. In contrast, patients from dysplasia and HIV units were infected in 56.2%-62.3% and 75.0%-76 .9% respectively in centre of disease control stage III-IV, HPV detect ion rates in patients from dysplasia and HIV units increased gradually from 40.1%-52.9% in non-suspicious smears to 80.8%-100% in atypical s mears. High risk HPV 16 and 18 infections were detected in 64% of smea rs with cytological evidence of HPV infection (koilocytosis) to 84.2% in severe dysplasia. Following the Bethesda guidelines, 2.9%-14.7% of all smears initially reported as Pap 2 K (suggestive of HPV infection) would be qualified as risk lesions (low grade squamous intraepithelia l lesions), although they tested HPV negative in more than a third of cases. Thus, when using the Bethesda system, HPV analysis is needed to prevent overclassification and overtreatment. The ''Munchner Nomenkla tur'' avoids this dilemma by not mixing morphological statements on in fection, atypia and cancer risk.