P. Lipponen et al., EXPRESSION OF E-CADHERIN (E-CD) AS RELATED TO OTHER PROGNOSTIC FACTORS AND SURVIVAL IN BREAST-CANCER, Journal of pathology, 174(2), 1994, pp. 101-109
A series of 208 breast cancer biopsies were analysed immunohistochemic
ally for expression of E-cadherin (E-CD). Altogether, 72 per cent of t
he tumours showed E-CD positivity in over 50 per cent of cells, the st
aining being heterogeneous in nearly all tumours. In only 16 per cent
of ductal carcinomas was positive staining seen in less than 1 per cen
t of cells. Expression of E-CD was not related to tumour diameter, nod
al status, metastasis at diagnosis, histologicaI grade, DNA ploidy, S-
phase fraction, nuclear area, mitotic frequency, or PR content. There
was a significant relationship between expression of E-CD, histologica
l type (P=0.01), the proportion of intraductal growth (P=0.008), the d
ensity of tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (P=0.0007), ER content (P=0.
012), and morphometric nuclear factors (P<0.02). Expression of E-CD sh
owed a weak association with a high survival probability (P=0.02), whi
le the relation to recurrence-free survival was not significant (P=0.1
). In axillary lymph node-negative tumours, E-CD expression was not re
lated significantly to survival(P=0.11) or to recurrence-free survival
(P=0.06). In multivariate analysis, E-CD expression had no independen
t prognostic value, while the axillary lymph node status, tumour diame
ter, patient age, and mitotic frequency were independent prognostic fa
ctors. The results indicate that E-CD expression is related to several
histological features in breast cancer, but has no independent progno
stic value over standard prognostic factors.