CAN WE TALK - INPATIENT DISCUSSIONS ABOUT ADVANCE DIRECTIVES IN A COMMUNITY-HOSPITAL - ATTENDING PHYSICIANS ATTITUDES, THEIR INPATIENTS WISHES, AND REPORTED EXPERIENCE
Bm. Reilly et al., CAN WE TALK - INPATIENT DISCUSSIONS ABOUT ADVANCE DIRECTIVES IN A COMMUNITY-HOSPITAL - ATTENDING PHYSICIANS ATTITUDES, THEIR INPATIENTS WISHES, AND REPORTED EXPERIENCE, Archives of internal medicine, 154(20), 1994, pp. 2299-2308
Background: The attitudes of hospitalized patients and their attending
physicians about advance directives have not been well studied. We co
mpared these attitudes and explored relationships between them and the
frequency of actual directives and directive discussions during hospi
talization. Methods: We conducted scripted interviews with 258 (94.5%)
of 273 patients admitted consecutively to the acute medical service o
f a community teaching hospital in Rochester, NY, and contemporaneousl
y surveyed their attending physicians (n=68) regarding attitudes about
advance directives. Primary outcome measures were patients' willingne
ss to discuss directives, actual physician-patient directive discussio
ns, and patients' preferences for life-sustaining treatments. Also mea
sured were physicians' indications for directive discussions, their re
asons not to discuss directives, and their knowledge and attitudes abo
ut life-sustaining treatments. Results: Eighty-one percent (172/212) o
f competent interviewed patients either did (100) or wanted to (72) di
scuss advance directives in hospital. Forty-one percent of patients ch
ose to forgo cardiopulmonary resuscitation; 24% to 41% refused other l
ife-sustaining interventions (intensive care unit admission, mechanica
l ventilation, cardioversion, vasopressors). Overall, 90% (246/273) of
all patients met at least one of three criteria reported by their phy
sicians as indications for advance directive discussions: age at least
75 years, critical or potentially fatal illness, and patients' desire
to discuss directives. Multiple logistic regression revealed that the
se same variables predicted patients' willingness to discuss cardiopul
monary resuscitation, their preferences to receive or forgo cardiopulm
onary resuscitation, and the frequency of physician-patient discussion
s about these issues. Conclusions: Most medical inpatients in a commun
ity hospital want to, are able to, and meet their own physicians' indi
cations to discuss advance directives. Hospitalization presents an unr
ealized opportunity for physicians and patients to initiate these disc
ussions.