THE INFLUENCE OF TILLAGE-INDUCED DIFFERENCES IN SURFACE MOISTURE-CONTENT ON SOIL-EROSION

Citation
K. Auerswald et al., THE INFLUENCE OF TILLAGE-INDUCED DIFFERENCES IN SURFACE MOISTURE-CONTENT ON SOIL-EROSION, Soil & tillage research, 32(1), 1994, pp. 41-50
Citations number
16
Categorie Soggetti
Agriculture Soil Science
Journal title
ISSN journal
01671987
Volume
32
Issue
1
Year of publication
1994
Pages
41 - 50
Database
ISI
SICI code
0167-1987(1994)32:1<41:TIOTDI>2.0.ZU;2-L
Abstract
After 7 years of conventional- and no-till for soybeans on a silt loam soil, replicate plots were tilled alike to produce similar surface co nditions for erosion evaluation. Three consecutive rainfall simulation s were carried out on each plot to examine whether no-till still had b eneficial carry-over effects in reducing soil erosion compared with pl ots with a conventional-till history. Soil moisture, prior to the firs t run, was 0.075 g g-1 greater on the previously untilled plots. Their soil loss was less than 30% of that from the previously tilled plots. To eliminate the effect of antecedent moisture content (M(a)) on soil loss and isolate the effect of other differences induced by soil use history, an equation between M(a) and soil loss was used. This had bee n independently derived from another silt loam soil. Three-fifths of t he difference in soil loss were attributed to the greater M(a). Two-fi fths (4.5 t ha-1) of the difference were attributed to other benefits of no-till such as greater aggregate stability and more biopores. Grea ter soil loss from the drier conventional-till treatment was a result of the increased breakdown of the soil surface structure before runoff started. The smoother surface resulted in a smaller water depth durin g runoff. Average depth on the driest conventional-till plot was only one-third of that on the no-till plot with the greatest M(a). The redu ced depth increased further detachment by raindrop impact and increase d sediment transport. The initial breakdown of structure influenced so il loss during all three consecutive runs. For both treatments, the so il loss of the third run was still influenced by the initial moisture content of the first run.