Wb. Stiles, DRUGS, RECIPES, BABIES, BATHWATER, AND PSYCHOTHERAPY PROCESS OUTCOME RELATIONS, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 62(5), 1994, pp. 955-959
In their critiques of Stiles and Shapiro's (1994) discussion of the pr
ocess-outcome correlation problem, Silberschatz (1994) and Sechrest (1
994) suggested that the problem is not fundamental but merely technica
l. Silberschatz suggested that more complex measures would solve the p
roblem; Sechrest suggested that more complex analyses would solve the
problem. Following Sechrest's multivariate suggestions, however, produ
ced no better result. Contrary to Silberschatz's and Sechrest's sugges
tions, the problem is not in the measures or the analyses but in the i
nterpretation of the results (null results as well as positive results
), particularly in a failure to incorporate fully the phenomenon of re
sponsiveness into an understanding of process-outcome relations.