E. Tirelli et Jm. Witkin, VERTICALIZATION OF BEHAVIOR ELICITED BY DOPAMINERGIC MOBILIZATION IS QUALITATIVELY DIFFERENT BETWEEN C57BL 6J AND DBA/2J MICE/, Psychopharmacology, 116(2), 1994, pp. 191-200
Behavioral effects of dopaminergic stimulation were evaluated in C57BL
/6J mice and compared to the effects occurring in DBA/2J mice, an inbr
ed strain with reduced densities of striatal dopamine receptors. Effec
ts of apomorphine (0.5-64 mg/kg) alone and in combination with cocaine
(30 mg/kg) were assessed using a time-sampling technique that classif
ied climbing and leaning in separate categories. Locomotion was also a
ssessed in a separate experiment. Climbing occurred in DBA/2J mice onl
y at doses of apomorphine that were 16 times higher than the smallest
effective dose in C57BL/6J mice; nevertheless, relative to baseline va
lues, effects were fairly comparable. By contrast, whereas DBA/2J mice
showed dose-dependent leaning under apomorphine, C57BL/6J mice exhibi
ted little leaning even at doses not producing climbing, and only afte
r the highest apomorphine dose was leaning significantly increased. Ap
omorphine was equipotent in inducing gnawing across strains, although
somewhat less efficacious in DBA/2J mice. When given alone, cocaine pr
oduced significant climbing, but not leaning or gnawing, in either str
ain. Whereas cocaine potentiated apomorphine-induced climbing and gnaw
ing in both strains, apomorphine-induced leaning was not consistently
changed by cocaine in either strain. These effects were not indirectly
due to hyperkinesia, since neither apomorphine alone nor apomorphine
and cocaine in combination was stimulant; apomorphine alone reduced lo
comotor activity and attenuated cocaine-induced hyperkinesia. The pres
ent data do not support a unitary, purely quantitative, account of ins
ensitivity to dopaminergic stimulation based upon low densities of str
iatal dopamine receptors in DBA/2J mice. Rather, this constellation of
results is suggestive of qualitative interstrain dissimilarities in d
opaminergic responsiveness that could reflect organizational differenc
es in receptor populations.