The main aims of the Sydney system for the classification of gastritis
are to improve uniformity in histopathological reporting and to provi
de a flexible matrix of rules for grading the histological, features.
We sought to determine the level of interobserver agreement between pa
thologists in the application of the Sydney system. Three histopatholo
gists independently examined H & E, alcian blue/PAS and modified Giems
a stained sections of two antral and two corpus gastric biopsies from
69 consecutive dyspeptic patients. After elimination of five unsuitabl
e cases, each observer graded chronic inflammation, polymorph activity
, atrophy, intestinal metaplasia and Helicobacter pylori density in th
e antrum and corpus on a 0-3 scale according to the Sydney system crit
eria. The pairwise agreement on final diagnosis and the overall and co
nditional agreement on histological grades were examined by kappa stat
istics. Agreement on the final diagnosis ranged from 83-94% with kappa
values of 0.699 ('good') to 0.887 ('excellent'). Conditional probabil
ity of agreement on a diagnosis of H. pylori positive gastritis was 99
%, but wider disagreements were apparent in the recognition of H. pylo
ri negative gastritis, reactive gastritis and even normal biopsies. Ov
erall agreement for grade ranged from 70% for antral atrophy to 94% fo
r intestinal metaplasia in the corpus with 'moderate' or 'good' kappa
values. We conclude that the diagnostic and grading criteria described
in the Sydney system can be applied consistently by histopathologists
. The findings underline its potential usefulness in routine practice.