In 1990, the U.S. Supreme Court in the case of Michigan Department of
State Police v. Sitz declared sobriety checkpoints constitutional in p
art because they were effective in reducing drunken driving. This repo
rt reviews the scientific literature on checkpoint effectiveness in or
der to evaluate the claim of deterrent accomplishments made in the bri
efs supporting the police. It concludes that studies available at the
time of the initial trial were insufficient to support the claim, but
that more recent studies lay a better foundation for believing that ch
eckpoints can deter drunken driving. The Court's definition of effecti
veness, however, turns out to have been based on checkpoints' yield of
arrests rather than on considerations of deterrence.