Kl. Preston et Ge. Bigelow, DRUG DISCRIMINATION ASSESSMENT OF AGONIST-ANTAGONIST OPIOIDS IN HUMANS - A 3-CHOICE SALINE-HYDROMORPHONE-BUTORPHANOL PROCEDURE, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics, 271(1), 1994, pp. 48-60
To assess the discriminative stimulus properties of mixed agonist-anta
gonist opioids in humans, postaddict volunteers were trained in a thre
e-choice drug discrimination procedure to discriminate among the effec
ts of saline (4 ml i.m.), hydromorphone (3 mg i.m.) and butorphanol (6
mg i.m.). Subjects earned monetary reinforcement by correctly identif
ying the training drugs by letter code. Other subjective, behavioral a
nd physiological measures were concurrently collected. After training,
generalization curves for hydromorphone, butorphanol, pentazocine, na
lbuphine and buprenorphine were determined. In generalization testing,
both hydromorphone and butorphanol produced dose-related increases in
hydromorphone-appropriate and butorphanol-appropriate responses, resp
ectively, and other characteristic subjective effect measures. Nalbuph
ine produced dose-related increases in discrimination as butorphanol a
nd in those subjective effect measures increased by butorphanol. Bupre
norphine produced dose-related increases in discrimination as hydromor
phone and in those subjective effect measures increased by hydromorpho
ne. Pentazocine was not consistently discriminated as either butorphan
ol or hydromorphone. These results differ from those of previous discr
imination studies using similar methods but different training drugs.
Compared to a previous study in which pentazocine served as the kappa-
like training drug, the use as a training drug of the more pharmacolog
ically specific kappa-like drug butorphanol permitted greater differen
tiation among test drugs and yielded discrimination results more consi
stent with other pharmacological evidence (buprenorphine being mu-like
and nalbuphine being kappa-like). There was a close relationship betw
een results of the discrimination measures and the subjective effect m
easures.