A DOUBLE-BLIND PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL OF EFAMOL MARINE ON SKIN AND JOINT SYMPTOMS OF PSORIATIC-ARTHRITIS

Citation
Dj. Veale et al., A DOUBLE-BLIND PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL OF EFAMOL MARINE ON SKIN AND JOINT SYMPTOMS OF PSORIATIC-ARTHRITIS, British journal of rheumatology, 33(10), 1994, pp. 954-958
Citations number
18
Categorie Soggetti
Rheumatology
ISSN journal
02637103
Volume
33
Issue
10
Year of publication
1994
Pages
954 - 958
Database
ISI
SICI code
0263-7103(1994)33:10<954:ADPTOE>2.0.ZU;2-6
Abstract
Fish oil may be beneficial in the treatment of psoriasis and in RA. We examined the potential benefit of Efamol Marine, a combination of eve ning primrose oil and fish oil in the treatment of 38 patients with Ps A. Patients with PsA were entered in a double-blind placebo controlled study and received either 12 Efamol Marine capsules or 12 placebo cap sules daily for 9 months. All patients received placebo capsules for a further 3 months. At month 3 of the study patients were asked to redu ce their intake of NSAIDs and maintain that decrease provided there wa s no worsening of their joint symptoms. Clinical assessments of skin a nd joint disease severity and activity were performed at 0, 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. All measures of skin disease activity including severi ty, percentage body affected and itch were unchanged by Efamol Marine. The NSAID requirement remained the same between both treatment groups . In addition, there was no change demonstrated in the activity of art hritis as measured by duration of morning stiffness, Ritchie articular index, number of active joints, ESR and CRP. However, a rise in serum TXB2 was observed in the active group during the placebo phase; in ad dition a fall in leukotriene B4 production occurred during the active phase period followed by a marked rise during the placebo phase sugges ting some laboratory documented anti-inflammatory effect. In conclusio n, this study suggests that Efamol Marine may alter prostaglandin meta bolism in patients with PsA, although it did not produce a clinical im provement and did not allow reduction in NSAID requirement. A larger d ose of essential fatty acid may be needed to produce a clinical benefi t.