P. Paoluzi et al., INTRAVARICEAL PRESSURE MEASUREMENT IN CIRRHOTIC-PATIENTS - IS IT A RELIABLE TECHNIQUE, The Italian Journal of Gastroenterology, 26(7), 1994, pp. 342-346
The aim of the present study is to evaluate in both ''in vitro'' and c
linical conditions the reliability of the method for measuring the oes
ophageal varices pressure by means of a sclerosing needle. The perfusi
on system was validated ''in vitro'', comparing the tracings obtained
with two different perfusion apparatus, with two different perfusional
agents and with the needle either completely or partially inserted in
a venous catheter perfused with saline solution, either in the same d
irection as the flow or the opposite one. The clinical validation was
conducted on 14 cirrhotic patients with II to IV grade oesophageal var
ices according to Dagradi's classification. During endoscopy, the intr
avariceal and oesophageal pressures were measured using a sclerosing n
eedle, perfused with hydrosoluble contrast medium. Once the intravaric
eal pressure measurement was completed, an X-ray film of the chest was
performed. The data were evaluated considering the absence of visible
contrast medium as evidence of correct intravariceal needle position,
and the presence of a roundish image as evidence of paravariceal inse
rtion of the needle. The presence of respiratory oscillations and intr
avariceal pressure values were verified in manometric tracings and wer
e compared with radiological findings. The ''in vitro'' tests showed n
o differences in the pressure recordings obtained using different pump
s, different perfusion agents and with different manners of inserting
the needle. Only twenty-eight of the manometric recordings were consid
ered adequate for evaluation in clinical conditions. The manometric re
cordings and X-ray films showed that a correct needle placement was ac
hieved on seven occasions and more frequently in large rather than sma
ll varices. With a correct insertion of the needle, the intravariceal
pressure values appeared to be identical in the same patient. In concl
usion, the sclerotherapy needle can be considered suitable for intrava
riceal pressure recordings, even though it is advisable to restrict th
e measurement to cases with large varices and at least two concordant
manometric values should be recorded in each patient.