EXPANDED GOLD STANDARD IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF CHLAMYDIA-TRACHOMATIS IN ALOW-PREVALENCE POPULATION - DIAGNOSTIC EFFICACY OF TISSUE-CULTURE, DIRECT IMMUNOFLUORESCENCE, ENZYME-IMMUNOASSAY, PCR AND SEROLOGY
H. Thejls et al., EXPANDED GOLD STANDARD IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF CHLAMYDIA-TRACHOMATIS IN ALOW-PREVALENCE POPULATION - DIAGNOSTIC EFFICACY OF TISSUE-CULTURE, DIRECT IMMUNOFLUORESCENCE, ENZYME-IMMUNOASSAY, PCR AND SEROLOGY, Genitourinary medicine, 70(5), 1994, pp. 300-303
Objective-To evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of chlamydia culture, di
rect immunofluorescence (DFA), direct enzyme immunoassay (EIA), polyme
rase chain reaction (FCR) and serology by defining positive culture or
at least two positive non-culture tests as true positive. Setting-Thr
ee gynaecological departments located in separate areas of Sweden. Pat
ients and Design-All pregnant women requesting abortion during a six m
onth period were included. In cases with unconfirmed non-culture tests
, reculture with multiple passage and PCR on the culture transport med
ium was performed for confirmation. Serum was analysed for chlamydial
antibodies type IgG, IgM and IgA using microimmunofluorescence. Result
s-18 of 419 (4.3%) patients were positive for chlamydia according to t
he defined criteria. Twelve of 419 (2.9%) were positive in standard cu
lture (primary inoculation). The sensitivity of standard culture, DFA,
EIA and PCR were 66.7%, 77.8%, 64.7% and 71.4% respectively. The spec
ificity 100% (by definition), 99.5%, 100%, 100% respectively. The posi
tive predictive value 100% (by definition), 87.5%, 100%, 100% respecti
vely. Negative predictive value 98.5%, 99.0%, 98.5%, 98.9% respectivel
y. Serum IgG titre of greater than or equal to 64 and greater than or
equal to 1024 gave positive predictive values of 10% and 21% respectiv
ely. Conclusions-When an expanded gold standard is used, the specifici
ty and positive predictive value of the non-culture tests used are com
parable with that of standard culture even in this low prevalence popu
lation. Standard culture underestimated the chlamydia prevalence by 33
%. The prevalence found represents a decrease from 10 to 2.9% of cultu
re verified chlamydia during four years in comparable populations. Chl
amydial antibodies of certain immunological classes are not necessaril
y present in cases with chlamydia.