In 1991, US electric utilities spent $1.8 billion on demand-side manag
ement (DSM) programs. However, utility DSM efforts vary enormously acr
oss the country, concentrated in only a few states. This concentration
is partly a function of regulatory reforms that remove disincentives
to utility shareholders for investments in DSM programs. A key compone
nt of these reforms is recovery of the net lost revenues caused by uti
lity DSM programs. These lost revenues occur between rate cases when a
utility encourages its customers to improve energy efficiency and cut
demand. The reduction in sales means that the utility has less revenu
e to cover its fixed costs. This article describes a new method, stati
stical recoupling (SR), that addresses this net-lost-revenue problem.
Like other decoupling approaches, SR breaks the link between revenues
and sales. Unlike other approaches, SR minimizes changes from traditio
nal regulation. In particular the revenue risks associated with year-t
o-year changes in weather and the economy remain with the utility unde
r SR. Statistical recoupling uses statistical models that explain reta
il electricity sales as functions of the number of utility customers,
winter and summer weather the condition of the local economy, electric
ity price, and perhaps a few other key variables. These models, along
with the actual values of the explanatory variables, are used to estim
ate ''allowed'' electricity sales and revenues in future years. For ex
ample, a utility might use quarterly data from 1980 through 1992 to es
timate the SR models. The models would then be used to determine allow
ed revenues for 1993, 1994, and 1995. Five utilities provided data to
use in testing this new approach. The empirical results are quite prom
ising. The annual errors are almost all less than 2%. And the 3-year a
verages for these utilities are less than 1.3%. The lack of patterns a
cross these 3 years and five utilities suggests that statistical recou
pling is a robust method.