J. Santolayaforgas et al., INTRAPARTUM FETAL SUBCUTANEOUS TISSUE FEMUR LENGTH RATIO - AN ULTRASONOGRAPHIC CLUE TO FETAL MACROSOMIA/, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 171(4), 1994, pp. 1072-1075
OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to compare the accuracy of ultrasonographic
intrapartum measurement of fetal abdominal circumference, estimated f
etal weight, and fetal subcutaneous tissue/femur length ratio in predi
cting large-for-gestational-age fetuses. STUDY DESIGN: A cross-section
al analysis of 173 normal patients delivered of normal, appropriate-fo
r-gestational-age infants (group 1) was performed to determine the nor
mal changes of standard fetal biometric parameters and subcutaneous ti
ssue throughout pregnancy. Measurements of fetal subcutaneous tissue w
ere made at the level of the femoral diaphysis. A second group of 101
well-dated patients had these measurements obtained within 24 hours of
delivery (group 2). Large for gestational age was defined as a birth
weight > 90th percentile for gestational age. The sensitivity and spec
ificity for prediction of large for gestational age of an intrapartum
measurement of an abdominal circumference > 90th percentile, estimated
fetal weight > 90th percentile, and fetal subcutaneous tissue/femur l
ength ratio > 2 deviations of the mean was calculated. RESULTS: In gro
up 1 the mean gestational age was 31.4 +/- 5.4 weeks (range 17 to 41 w
eeks). The femur length, abdominal circumference, and fetal subcutaneo
us tissue correlated well with gestational age (p < 0.0001). The fetal
subcutaneous tissue/femur length ratio was stable throughout pregnanc
y, with a mean of 0.05 +/- 0.014 (range 0.02 to 0.09, R(2) 0.09). In g
roup 2 mean gestational age was 38 +/- 2.5 weeks (range 30 to 42 weeks
). Mean birth weight was 3280 +/- 740 gm (range 1513 to 4801 gm). Nine
teen (19%) fetuses were large for gestational age. Significant differe
nces were found between the appropriate- and large-for-gestational-age
fetuses for birth weight, abdominal circumference, estimated fetal we
ight, and fetal subcutaneous tissue/femur length ratio (p < 0.0001). T
he sensitivity and specificity of the fetal abdominal circumference, e
stimated fetal weight, and fetal subcutaneous tissue/femur length rati
o were 44% and 98%, 68% and 85%, and 82% and 96%, respectively. CONCLU
SION: The fetal subcutaneous tissue/femur length ratio is a gestationa
l age-independent parameter that has a greater sensitivity than the fe
tal abdominal circumference or estimated fetal weight formula for the
intrapartum identification of large-for-gestational-age fetuses.