K. Bile et al., CONTRASTING ROLES OF RIVERS AND WELLS AS SOURCES OF DRINKING-WATER ONATTACK AND FATALITY RATES IN A HEPATITIS-E EPIDEMIC IN SOMALIA, The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 51(4), 1994, pp. 466-474
Citations number
28
Categorie Soggetti
Public, Environmental & Occupation Heath","Tropical Medicine
In early 1988, an increased incidence of acute hepatitis was observed
in villages along the Shebeli River in the Lower Shebeli region of Som
alia. This was followed by a large epidemic that lasted until late 198
9. In a survey of 142 villages with a population of 245,312 individual
s, 11,413 icteric cases were recorded, of which 346 died, correspondin
g to an attack rate and a case fatality rate of 4.6% and 3.0%, respect
ively. The etiologic role of hepatitis E virus (HEV) in this epidemic
was proven by demonstrating anti-HEV in 128 of 145 sampled cases as a
sign of recent infection with HEV. In three villages, where a special
study protocol was implemented, the attack rate was found to increase
significantly with age from 5% in the group 1-4 years of age to 13% in
the group 5-15 years of age and to 20% for persons older than 15 year
s of age. Among cases 20-39 years of age, the female-to-male ratio was
1.5:1, which was a significant predominance of females. As in other h
epatitis E outbreaks, there was a high fatality rate in pregnant femal
es, estimated to be 13.8%. The epidemic peaked with the rise in the le
vel of the river during rainfall, suggesting that the disease was wate
rborne. The attack rate was higher (6.0%) in villages supplied with ri
ver water, while fewer cases were recorded in those relying on wells o
r ponds for their water supply, 1.7% and 1.2%, respectively. In contra
st, cases were more severe and had a higher case fatality rate (8.6%)
in villages supplied by wells compared with those relying on river or
pond water, 2.5% and 0.8%, respectively. This discrepancy was presumed
to reflect the inoculum size of infection made possible with water fr
om wells when the latter were contaminated. In the three villages subj
ected to a special study, person-to-person transmission within family
compounds did not seem to be an important factor since 74.5% of the ca
ses in affected compounds occurred less than one month after the first
case, and another 6.8% during the second month; thus, the majority we
re not Likely to be secondary cases.