Initially basal ganglia was a descriptive term for onto- and phylogene
tic or topographic classifications. A variable list of structures were
included as basal ganglia. A major step,vas made,when the thalamus wa
s separated from the ''striated bodies'' (Vie d'Azyr, 1786) which was
sometimes taken into account in the French description of the noyaux g
ris centraux. Even if the term is not perfect, it is preferable to ''t
he system of basal ganglia''. The subdivisions of the putamen, the dis
tinction between the striatum and the pallidum were not really made un
til the beginning of the twentieth century. Modern tracing methods wer
e needed to demonstrate the main connections. It was not until the end
of the 1960s that the importance of the striato-pallido-nigral networ
k within the basal ganglia and the cortico-striatal connections, the m
ain afferent system, were recognized. With the description of the the
cortico-striatal connections, the sub-cortical system with multiple co
mplex ''loops'' was questioned. The term ''extra-pyramidal system'' ha
d an exagerated success. Initially, if designated descending non-pyram
idal afferents (some which do not exist) and their source. In 1992, Sp
atz based his separation of this heterogeneous group on the iron conte
nt. The terms of extra-pyramidal ''system'' and ''syndrome'' should be
abandonned by clinicians. Physiological interpretations have varied.
The role of automatic a habitual motricity, derived from a concept of
hierarchic, Jacksonian cerebral organization, was questioned when the
pyramidal network was described. Clinico-pathological analysis (hemiba
llism, Parkinson's disease...) has placed new emphasis on the motor ro
le, for a time the only role accepted as real. More recently, debate h
as centred on other roles, particularly in cognition and motivation. A
n illustration of functions other than purely motor functions of the b
asal ganglia is given by the syndromes of loss of psychic auto-activat
ion secondary to bilateral lesions.