H. Appel et al., CRASH TESTS FOR PASSENGER CARS AND THEIR RELATIONSHIP TO THE ACTUAL ACCIDENT OCCURRENCE, Nuclear Engineering and Design, 150(2-3), 1994, pp. 473-481
Current consensus about crash tests implies that, for verification of
self-protection of a vehicle or its occupants, at least three full siz
e tests with the following specifications are necessary: (1) frontal i
mpact against a rigid, non-moving 0-degree-barrier with 100% overlap;
(2) frontal offset impact against a rigid, non-moving 15-degrees-barri
er with 50% overlap (impact speed between 50 and 55 km h-1); (3) side
impact of a moving deformable barrier; preferably according to EEVC-me
thod (impact speed 50 km h-1). From the social general view it is not
sufficient to test only the self-protection of the vehicle and to give
most importance to the front of the vehicle. The other factors of pas
sive safety, partner protection and compatibility, respectively, have
to be included, as two thirds of the cost of injuries originates from
car-to-car accidents, and only one third from vehicle collisions again
st fixed objects. It follows that at least one additional test of comp
atibility has to be added to those mentioned above. It has to be inves
tigated whether this compatibility test could be a frontal impact agai
nst a controllably deformable barrier and could substitute one or even
two of the first-mentioned tests.