Eg. Daoud et al., INCIDENCE, PRESENTATION, DIAGNOSIS, AND MANAGEMENT OF MALFUNCTIONING IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER-DEFIBRILLATOR RATE-SENSING LEADS, The American heart journal, 128(5), 1994, pp. 892-895
Recognition of tachyarrhythmia by an implantable cardioverter-defibril
lator (ICD) requires an intact rate-sensing lead. We retrospectively e
xamined 266 consecutive patients requiring an ICD to characterize the
incidence, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and management of a defec
tive rate-sensing lead. To identify clinical parameters that may contr
ibute to lead complications, we also assessed the effects of age, gend
er, type of rate-sensing lead, manufacturer of the lead, and surgeon.
Over a follow-up period of 30 +/- 22 months (mean +/- standard deviati
on), a defective lead was found in 9 (3.4%) patients, in 9 (1.7%) of 5
14 leads over a period of 2 to 39 (mean 17 +/- 15) months after implan
tation. Except for 1 patient, in whom a lead fracture was incidently f
ound during ICD generator replacement, these patients had multiple ina
ppropriate shocks of recent onset. Clinical parameters were not helpfu
l in identifying patients at risk for lead complication. An abnormal b
eeping signal obtained while the patients performed various maneuvers
was helpful in confirming a defect. All of the defective leads were ep
icardial. These cases were managed by placement of a transvenous endoc
ardial lead.