Ma. Oliver et al., COMPARISON OF 5 TYPES OF PIG CROSSES .2. FRESH MEAT QUALITY AND SENSORY CHARACTERISTICS OF DRY-CURED HAM, Livestock production science, 40(2), 1994, pp. 179-185
Carcasses of 109 gilts and 119 barrows from crosses including Duroc (D
U), Landrace (LR), Large White (LW) and Belgian Landrace (BL) componen
ts were used to analyze their meat quality. The crosses were DU X (LR
X LW), LW X (DU X LW), LW X (LR X LW), BL X (DU X LW), and BL X (LR X
LW). Muscle pH and electrical conductivity were measured in the Longis
simus dorsi (LD) and Semimembranosus muscles. Colour, water holding ca
pacity, intramuscular lipid content, total protein and water content w
as determined on LD muscle. A sample of 32 right hams from each cross
were dry-cured. The cushion (which includes the muscles Biceps femoris
, Semimembranosus and Semitendinosus) was used for panel and consumer
tests. There were no differences in meat quality traits related to PSE
condition between DU and LW sired pigs, but BL sired pigs showed a po
orer meat quality. Intramuscular fat content was higher in the DU sire
d pigs. Texture of hams produced by DU sired pigs and BL X (LR X LW) w
ere judged softer and more pastier. There were no significant differen
ces between crosses in flavour characteristics. Consumer acceptability
was better in LW and DU sired pigs. The DU dam genes in the BL sired
pigs improved overall acceptability of the ham with respect to BL X (L
R X LW), classified as the poorest ham.