D. Singh, WAIST-TO-HIP RATIO AND JUDGMENT OF ATTRACTIVENESS AND HEALTHINESS OF FEMALE FIGURES BY MALE AND FEMALE PHYSICIANS, International journal of obesity, 18(11), 1994, pp. 731-737
Sexual dimorphism in body fat distribution as measured by waist-to-hip
ratio (WHR) is unique to humans. The WHR has been shown to be an accu
rate predictor of risk for various diseases, premature mortality, degr
ee of androgenicity/estrogenicity and fecundity of women, independent
of overall body weight. This study investigated whether physicians wou
ld be influenced by body size or WHR in assessing health, youthfulness
, and reproductive capability of a woman. Line drawings of 12 female f
igures representing three categories of body weight (normal, underweig
ht and overweight) and four sizes of WHR (0.7, 0.8, 0.9 and 1.0) were
ranked by male and female physicians for these qualities as well as fo
r attractiveness and intelligence. Both males and females assigned hig
her ranking for many of these qualities to normal weight figures with
low WHRs (0.7 and 0.8). overweight figures were assigned low rankings
for all these qualities except reproductive capabiity. Underweight fig
ures, regardless of WHR size, were assigned low ranking for reproducti
ve capability and those underweight figures that had high WHRs (0.9 an
d 1.0) were assigned low ranking for healthiness. While there were min
or sex differences in ranking of some attributes for some figures, gen
erally both male and female physicians utilized the WHR in a similar m
anner to infer healthiness, reproductive capability and attractiveness
.