BIOMECHANICAL COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT DEV ICES FOR EMERGENCY STABILIZATION OF THE PELVIS

Citation
T. Pohlemann et al., BIOMECHANICAL COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT DEV ICES FOR EMERGENCY STABILIZATION OF THE PELVIS, Der Unfallchirurg, 97(10), 1994, pp. 503-510
Citations number
NO
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery
Journal title
ISSN journal
01775537
Volume
97
Issue
10
Year of publication
1994
Pages
503 - 510
Database
ISI
SICI code
0177-5537(1994)97:10<503:BCODDI>2.0.ZU;2-R
Abstract
Massive bleeding with shock is still the most frequent reason for earl y death after complex pelvic trauma. For hemostasis, fracture stabiliz ation in the pelvic ring is an important aspect. By use of the externa l fixator and introduction of emergency pelvic c-clamps, attempts were made to include pelvic ring stabilization on the early resuscitation algorithm. This biomechanical study compared a simple anterior externa l fixator (one supraacetabular pin on each side), the emergency pelvic c-clamp (Ganz) and the Browner modification of the clamp (''ACE clamp ''). Two fresh-frozen human cadaver pelves were loaded in a one-leg st ance model. The displacement and rotations on the site with the fractu re were measured with a 3D measurement system. Fracture models include d a Tile type B injury and two Tile type C instabilities (pure SI disl ocation; transforminal sacrum fracture). In type B injuries all method s withstood loading with 100% of the body weight (640/700 N). In C-typ e injuries with SI dislocation the external fixator showed no signific ant holding force, whereas the two c-clamps withstood loading of 112 N and 160 N. In the transforaminal fracture model no one method withsto od a load of more than 40 N. The combination of the clamps with the ex ternal fixator increased the holding strength to 66 N and 103 N. Altho ugh a single-leg-stance model does not reflect the emergency situation , in which the patient is normally in a supine position, the data reco rded are comparable to those observed in earlier investigations. They suggest an acceptable stability of the c-clamps for pure SI dislocatio ns, whereas in unstable pelvic fractures, including transforaminal fra cture lines, stabilization should be enhanced by an anterior device as soon as possible.