This article examines the deductive basis upon which domestic-level th
eorizing may be combined with liberal and realist systemic-level theor
y in order to account for international outcomes. It is particularly c
oncerned with whether existing systemic theory can incorporate domesti
c-lever variables in a causally consistent rather than ad hoc manner.
In addressing such a concern, it confronts the widely herd assumption
in the IR theory literature that liberalism is more accommodating of d
omestic-level variables and their potential causal impact than is real
ism. When the deductive logic of systemic liberal and realist theory i
s examined, however, it becomes dear that domestic-level variables can
be consistently causal in systemic realist theory, but are accorded l
ittle causal weight in systemic liberal theory. The article concludes
that realism is actually more accommodating of domestic-level variable
s and theorizing than is liberalism. Given the common misconceptions w
ithin the field regarding the relationship between systemic theories a
nd domestic-level theorizing, issues of theoretical causal compatibili
ty must be considered if domestic-level variables are going to be inco
rporated in a rigorous rather than ad hoc manner.