Women's superiority in decoding nonverbal cues of emotion has often be
en discussed as an adaptation to low status. To examine the relation o
f status to nonverbal sensitivity, ''subordination'' in 83 female empl
oyees of a large university was defined in terms of marriage tradition
ality, gender-role values salary rank, and self-reported subordination
at work. Sensitivity to nonverbal cues was measured using voice tone
clips from the Profile of Nonverbal Sensitivity (PONS). Measures of su
bordination as defined by marriage and gender-role values showed that
less subordinate women were better decoders of a female encoder than w
ere more subordinate women. These measures were not significantly rela
ted to success in decoding a male encoder. The hypothesis that women i
n lower ranked jobs would have greater ability to decode nonverbal aff
ect cues was significantly disconfirmed for one subscale of the PONS a
nd received no support for the other subscales and total score. Among
higher-ranked women only, subjective feelings of subordination on the
job had a linear relation to one PONS subscore, such that better decod
ers felt more subordinate; there were also quadratic trends for other
subscores showing that both the least and most subordinate-feeling wer
e the most accurate decoders. Limitations and future directions for th
e subordination hypothesis are discussed in light of these findings.