Basic level, ''subtype'' stereotypes of women and men were investigate
d in this study. Students from two dissimilar college campuses were gi
ven 2 minutes to generate highly accessible types of men and women. On
e purpose of the study was to obtain descriptive information-evaluativ
e valence, stereotypicality, and complexity-about the subtype represen
tations of women and men in our culture. Additional purposes of the st
udy were to ascertain differences in the representations of male and f
emale subtypes as a function of individual differences (the gender-rol
e of subjects) and as a function of group differences (i.e., ingroup/o
utgroup differences due to subjects' gender and regional/institutional
differences due to campuses). Subjects generated a greater number of
male than female subtypes. However, female subtypes tended to be more
evaluatively positive than male subtypes. Although group and individua
l differences influenced the characteristics of the subtypes generated
, these characteristics mirrored the general patterns of attributes as
sociated with the gender subtypes. These patterns of subtype attribute
s are compared to those documented in previous research and are discus
sed from feminist and cognitive perspectives.