Background. Standard, nonparametric statistical methods estimate only
the impact of therapy on survival rate up to a selected follow-up inte
rval. In contrast, parametric methods can estimate the impact of treat
ment on the two cardinal parameters of malignancy: likelihood of cure
and recurrence free survival time among uncured patients. Methods. The
authors screened a total of six parametric survival models. Three of
these, including the log normal model, were applied to survival data f
rom five clinical trials of adjuvant therapy for Stage II breast cance
r. For comparison, the log rank test, a standard nonparametric method,
was also applied to the same data. Results. Both parametric and nonpa
rametric methods identified a significant therapeutic effect in three
of the five trials. In only one of these three trials, however, did pa
rametric analysis identify a significant difference in the likelihood
of cure between treatment groups. In the remaining two trials, a signi
ficant difference was found in recurrence free survival time among unc
ured patients. The three parametric survival models gave similar resul
ts. Conclusion. These findings suggest that parametric analysis may wa
rrant further study as a method for measuring the long term clinical i
mpact of adjuvant therapy on Stage II breast cancer.