A comparative case study revealed divergent emerging judgments of a te
acher career ladder in two schools. Educators in the two sites strongl
y disagreed over the relative salutary impact of the new tasks and res
ponsibilities on instruction and student learning. In an earlier analy
sis, the use of work structure and group-level frameworks fell short i
n providing a full explanation for site-specific differences in teache
rs' individual perceptions of the career ladder reform. Therefore, a d
eductive analysis of the cases was conducted applying role theory cons
tructs. It revealed individual-group dynamics embedded in group concep
tions of role. Conclusions support the assertions that interpretations
drawn from the immediate environment have profound impacts on ''objec
tive'' tasks associated with work characteristics and their outcomes a
nd emphasize the ambiguity of innovation in established organizations.