Ls. Robins et al., A PREDICTIVE MODEL OF STUDENT SATISFACTION WITH THE MEDICAL-SCHOOL LEARNING-ENVIRONMENT, Academic medicine, 72(2), 1997, pp. 134-139
Citations number
14
Categorie Soggetti
Medicine, General & Internal","Education, Scientific Disciplines","Medical Informatics
Purpose. To examine differences in attitudes toward the medical school
learning environment among student subgroups based on gender and race
-ethnicity, to identify the most influential predictors of student sat
isfaction with the learning environment, and to create a model of stud
ent satisfaction with the learning environment. Method. Three years of
survey data (1992-93 to 1994-95) from first-year students at the Univ
ersity of Michigan Medical School were combined. The total sample cons
isted of 430 respondents, broken into two sets of subgroups: women (n
= 171) and men (n = 259), and whites (n = 239) and underrepresented mi
norities (n = 74). Asian students were removed from analyses when comp
arisons were made by race-ethnicity, but were included in the analyses
for all students and those comparing men and women. Student's t-tests
were used to identify differences between gender and racial-ethnic gr
oups in mean responses to seven survey items, and effect sizes were us
ed to characterize the magnitudes and practical significances of the d
ifferences. Forward stepwise regression was conducted to determine the
best predictive models for each student subgroup and for the total sa
mple; the subgroup models were compared with each other as well as wit
h the total-sample model. Results. Cross-validation of the gender and
race-ethnicity models showed that the men's satisfaction and the women
's satisfaction were predicted equally well using either subgroup's mo
del, and that the white students' satisfaction and the underrepresente
d-minority students' satisfaction were predicted equally well using ei
ther subgroup's model. Furthermore, the total-sample model, employing
a subset of five predictors, was similar in its predictive power to th
e subgroup models. Conclusion. The study's findings suggest that curri
culum structure (timely feedback and the promotion of critical thinkin
g) and students' perceptions of the priority faculty place on students
' education are prominent predictors of student satisfaction (across a
ll subgroups) with the learning environment. In contrast, students' pe
rceptions of the learning environment as a comfortable place for all g
ender and racial-ethnic groups, although less prominent predictors of
satisfaction, will discriminate among the subgroups.