O. Pytela et J. Liska, CHEMOMETRICAL ANALYSIS OF SUBSTITUENT EFFECTS .5. ORTHO EFFECT, Collection of Czechoslovak Chemical Communications, 59(9), 1994, pp. 2005-2021
The dissociation constants of nineteen ortho substituted benzoic acids
have been determined in eight organic solvents (methanol, ethanol, ac
etone, dimethyl sulfoxide, dimethylformamide, acetonitrile, pyridine,
1,2-dichloroethane). The correlation between the sigma(I), sigma(R), a
nd upsilon constants were unsuccessful due to neglecting the descripti
on of intramolecular hydrogen bond effect. The method of conjugated de
viations has been applied to the results obtained and to those given i
n literature for ortho substituted benzoic acids (the dissociation con
stants, the reaction with diphenyldiazomethane, 33 sets), and values o
f three types of substituent constants have been determined for 29 sub
stituents. The first of these substituent constants, sigma(o)(i), desc
ribes the electronic effects and was adjusted with the application of
the isoparameter relation (sigma(o)(i) as a function of sigma(m)(i)) s
uggested in previous communications. This constant (after excluding th
e substituents NHCOCH3 and OCOCH3) correlates very well (R = 0.993) wi
th the sigma(I) and sigma(R) constants. The second substituent constan
t, sigma(HG)(i), describes the interaction of the reaction centre (the
oxygen atom of carboxylate anion) with the substituent, and it has no
n-zero values for the substituents OH, SH, NH2, NHCH3, NHCOCH3, COOH,
CONH2, and SO2NH2. The third substituent constant, sigma(S)(i), descri
bes the steric effects and is not significantly related to any of the
known quantities of this type. The set given was tested together with
the triad of sigma(I), sigma(R) and upsilon on the definition set and
on a set extended by other 28 sets of processes with ortho substituted
compounds. On the whole, the set of substituent constants suggested e
xplains 94.6% of variability of data, whereas only 66.0% are explained
with the use of sigma(I), sigma(R), and upsilon constants. Moreover,
the tests have shown that the sigma(o)(1) constant is not suitable for
interpretations of processes involving direct conjugation between the
reaction centre and substituent.