A MORE GENERAL-APPROACH TO DISTINGUISHING HOMOGENEOUS FROM HETEROGENEOUS CATALYSIS - DISCOVERY OF POLYOXOANION-STABILIZED AND BU(4)N(-STABILIZED, ISOLABLE AND REDISSOLVABLE, HIGH-REACTIVITY IR-APPROXIMATE-TO-190-450 NANOCLUSTER CATALYSTS())
Y. Lin et Rg. Finke, A MORE GENERAL-APPROACH TO DISTINGUISHING HOMOGENEOUS FROM HETEROGENEOUS CATALYSIS - DISCOVERY OF POLYOXOANION-STABILIZED AND BU(4)N(-STABILIZED, ISOLABLE AND REDISSOLVABLE, HIGH-REACTIVITY IR-APPROXIMATE-TO-190-450 NANOCLUSTER CATALYSTS()), Inorganic chemistry, 33(22), 1994, pp. 4891-4910
A more general approach to distinguishing between so-called homogeneou
s vs heterogeneous catalysts has been developed and intrinsically: tes
ted in answering the question ''what is the true catalyst in the activ
e hydrogenation system which evolves from cyclohexene, hydrogen, and t
he discrete, polyoxoanion-supported Ir(I) catalyst precursor (Bu(4)N)(
5)Na-3[(1,5-COD)Ir.P2W15Nb3O62]?''. The approach developed and utilize
d consists of four categories of experiments: (i) catalyst isolation a
nd characterization studies, with an emphasis initially,on TEM (transm
ission electron microscopy); (ii) initial kinetic studies, emphasizing
whether or not the isolated catalyst can account for the observed kin
etics, especially any induction period seen, and whether pr not the re
action exhibits a +/-10% reproducible rate; (iii) quantitative phenome
nological catalyst poisoning and recovery experiments;(iv) additional
kinetic and mechanistic studies and chemical tests, all interpreted wi
th strict adherence to the principle that the correct description of t
he catalyst (i.e., the correct mechanism) will explain all of the data
. The present approach has identified a previously unknown type of hyb
rid homogeneous-heterogeneous, Ir-similar to 190-45.polyoxoanion/BU4N catalyst of average composition [Ir(0)(similar to 300) (P4W30Nb6O1231
6-)(similar to 33)](BU4N)(similar to 300)Na-similar to 233. The discov
ery of, and ability to distinguish, even an unprecedented hybrid homog
eneous-heterogeneous catalyst strongly suggests that the present appro
ach will be more generally applicable to the difficult and often unsol
ved mechanistic problem of distinguishing catalysis by a discrete, hom
ogeneous metal complex vs that by a soluble metal nanocluster or collo
id ''heterogeneous'' catalyst. Some false starts and incorrect leads i
n the early stages of this work are discussed, research which illustra
tes some of the pitfalls to be avoided in attempts to distinguish homo
geneous from heterogeneous catalysts. A minimum mechanistic scheme for
the catalyst's evolution, consisting of the autocatalytic generation
of the Ir-similar to 190-450 nanoclusters, is shown to account for all
of the observed results, including the findings of the rate-enhancing
effects of H+, H2O, and acetone impurities that were puzzling in the
earlier stages of this work, before the Ir-similar to.190-450 nanoclus
ter catalysts were identified.