P. Mrozek et al., SULFATE ADSORPTION ON A AU(111) ELECTRODE STUDIED BY AES, CEELS, LEEDAND CYCLIC VOLTAMMETRY, Surface science, 319(1-2), 1994, pp. 21-33
We have studied interactions of sulfate anions with a Au(111) electrod
e using Auger electron spectroscopy (AES), low energy electron diffrac
tion (LEED), core electron energy loss spectroscopy (CEELS), and elect
rochemistry, and have employed a nonstandard method of quantitative an
alysis by AES in which the anion coverage is determined using a thick
Na2SO4 film as a reference. A favorable comparison of surface coverage
results obtained in this manner with the radiochemical, in situ, data
shows that the sulfate adsorbate formed in solution does not desorb u
pon exposure to ultra-high vacuum (UHV). Since the AES ratio of oxygen
-to-sulfur in the sulfate adlattice is 4, and the S(LMM) Anger electro
n transitions and S(L(2,3)) core electron energy loss spectra show a c
haracteristic S6+ surface valency, our results indicate that no decomp
osition, e.g., dehydration, of the anion occurs in UHV. In a narrow po
tential range around E=1.12 V on the potential scale in use, the adsor
bate forms an ordered Au(111) (root 3 X root 3)R30 degrees adlattice t
hat gives rise to a clear, but diffuse LEED pattern. This structure is
discussed vis-a-vis recent scanning tunneling microscopy results with
the same Au(111)/solution interface. In addition to the structural co
nsiderations, our companion spectroscopic analyses suggest that surfac
e gold electrons participate in the anion chemisorption. Namely, below
1.12 V, the down-shift in the core electron loss energy is indicative
of increasing electron density on sulfur with increasing sulfate-surf
ace bonding via a back-donation into empty electronic orbitals. Above
1.12 V, the electron loss spectra are dominated by the final state eff
ect induced by the decrease in the number of sulfate oxygen atoms that
coordinate the electrode surface.