F. Alfonso et al., CORONARY STENTING FOR ACUTE CORONARY DISSECTION AFTER CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY - IMPLICATIONS OF RESIDUAL DISSECTION, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 24(4), 1994, pp. 989-995
Objectives. The aim of this study was to assess the implications of re
sidual coronary dissections after stenting. Background. Coronary stent
ing is currently used in selected patients with coronary dissection af
ter angioplasty. However, in some patients the total length of the dis
section may not be completely covered with the device. Methods. Forty-
two consecutive patients (mean [+/- SD] age 58 +/- 11 Sears; 39 men, 3
women) undergoing stenting for a major coronary dissection after angi
oplasty were studied. Results. Thirty (67%) coronary dissections were
small (less than or equal to 15 mm), and 29 (64%) were occlusive (Thro
mbolysis in Myocardial Infarction [TIMI] flow grade less than or equal
to 2). In 3 patients, coronary stenting was unable to open large occl
usive dissections, but a good angiographic result was obtained in 39 p
atients (93%). After stenting, 22 of these patients (56%) had no visib
le residual dissections, and 13 (33%) had small and 4 (10%) had large
residual dissections. These residual dissections were stable and did n
ot compromise coronary flow. In a repeat angiogram (24 h later) the st
ent was patent in all 39 patients. However, two patients experienced a
subacute stent occlusion. Of the remaining 37 patients, 36 (97%) had
a late angiogram after stenting. Quantitative angiography revealed a r
eduction in minimal lumen diameter at the stent site (2.6 +/- 0.4 vs.
2 +/- 0.7 mm, p < 0.05) and a trend toward improvement in vessel diame
ter at the site of the previous residual dissection (1.7 +/- 0.6 vs. 1
.9 +/- 0.5 mm, p < 0.1). The angiographic image of residual dissection
disappeared in all patients. These factors provided a rather smooth a
ngiographic appearance at follow-up. The four patients with large resi
dual dissections after stenting did not have restenosis and were asymp
tomatic at last visit. Conclusions. Coronary stenting is effective in
the management of acute coronary dissections after angioplasty. In th
is setting, small residual dissections are frequently seen but have a
good outcome and disappear at follow-up. Large residual dissections ma
y have a good outcome if coronary how is not impaired and no residual
stenosis is visualized.