PURPOSE: To assess the reliability and reproducibility of automated la
rge-core breast biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A consortium of 20 inst
itutions reported, in a standardized fashion, their core breast biopsy
data. All biopsies were performed with ''long-throw'' (2.3-cm) automa
ted core biopsy devices fitted with 14-gauge needles. Needle guidance
was accomplished by means of either a dedicated, stereotaxic device, i
n which the patient lies in the prone position, or high-frequency elec
tronically focused ultrasound equipment. RESULTS: The data in 6,152 le
sions were gathered. Clinical or surgical follow-up was available in 3
,765 lesions; 1,363 of these lesions were subsequently surgically exci
sed, and the core histologic study showed cancer in 910 lesions, mamma
ry intraepithelial neoplasia in 173 lesions, and benign disease in 280
lesions. In these 280 lesions, there were 15 false-negative core biop
sies. CONCLUSION: The data show that percutaneous large-core breast bi
opsy is a reproducible and reliable alternative to surgical biopsy.